Information on Result #486195

There is no (138, 242, 1630)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 816300 442626 820984 569639 700626 978567 965139 066764 888477 047084 212980 039718 266322 138945 335369 653340 178459 282926 664169 > 3242

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (138, 243, 1630)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction