Information on Result #486209
There is no (166, 242, 8172)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 141424 863681 434538 261815 732889 006807 643232 443667 674385 385653 280661 895387 093409 746848 148299 847515 799049 440898 382665 > 3242
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (166, 243, 8172)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |