Information on Result #486657

There is no (168, 248, 7121)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 21235 800511 491919 075205 628740 588230 549235 938014 322661 404002 853343 867874 169854 621661 794234 899018 077809 021260 895782 996001 > 3248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 249, 7121)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction