Information on Result #487287

There is no (21, 53, 212)-net in base 4, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 86 005410 455481 552781 967163 495085 > 453

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 54, 212)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction