Information on Result #488286

There is no (36, 96, 316)-net in base 4, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 6736 209319 610997 704996 845865 076209 315449 568596 545193 030840 > 496

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 97, 316)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction