Information on Result #494097

There is no (96, 218, 1065)-net in base 4, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 186389 213182 179889 389543 795691 326471 978967 878489 417424 226053 111333 102518 413582 057843 884919 985806 032505 806825 541027 717611 019222 984704 > 4218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 219, 1065)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction