Information on Result #494631

There is no (110, 226, 1613)-net in base 4, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11827 756759 372020 991883 309132 611939 194166 034791 013688 808537 420061 358496 310098 893871 669617 710957 890908 375205 049072 625235 026159 088452 871720 > 4226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (110, 227, 1613)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction