Information on Result #497368

There is no (16, 38, 312)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 374 450400 584697 445404 582369 > 538

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 39, 312)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction