Information on Result #497368
There is no (16, 38, 312)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 374 450400 584697 445404 582369 > 538
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (16, 39, 312)-net in base 5 | [i] | m-Reduction |