Information on Result #497432

There is no (17, 43, 282)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1 163850 509395 871970 029403 928425 > 543

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 44, 282)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction