Information on Result #497471
There is no (16, 46, 213)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 143 045571 723442 647592 504828 482845 > 546
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 47, 213)-net in base 5 | [i] | m-Reduction | |