Information on Result #497516

There is no (17, 49, 224)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 18125 574530 826814 543124 579989 200897 > 549

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 50, 224)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction