Information on Result #497799
There is no (21, 65, 248)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 2867 589412 544504 070334 134997 144436 484408 859521 > 565
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 66, 248)-net in base 5 | [i] | m-Reduction |