Information on Result #498359

There is no (64, 88, 176629)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 32 313041 637442 749308 446955 564665 939641 899707 402474 357823 439825 > 588

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 89, 176629)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction