Information on Result #498404

There is no (46, 90, 1622)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 811 207148 051048 002711 348137 289831 578966 990171 819635 344846 835265 > 590

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 91, 1622)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction