Information on Result #498622

There is no (26, 98, 260)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 326 730179 439758 565650 950093 325045 156273 037252 146419 201760 723072 609025 > 598

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (26, 99, 260)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction