Information on Result #499034

There is no (29, 111, 286)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 403209 608308 470771 460802 903106 333580 483370 000640 602102 300309 360828 170779 221625 > 5111

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 112, 286)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction