Information on Result #499697

There is no (69, 129, 3029)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1 483078 231386 201261 128676 955669 552421 087225 576645 461338 560919 393315 548401 824584 441470 077225 > 5129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 130, 3029)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction