Information on Result #499930

There is no (65, 135, 1702)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 23361 509021 730706 539807 030046 453827 098937 759485 221367 227862 561969 323422 374465 837408 726581 217465 > 5135

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 136, 1702)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction