Information on Result #502508

There is no (16, 24, 82887)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4722 478786 318602 139167 > 824

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 25, 82887)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction