Information on Result #502544
There is no (9, 29, 264)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 159 598001 431025 515707 712672 > 829
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 30, 264)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |