Information on Result #502680

There is no (10, 42, 219)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 88 687541 122984 760838 223823 654174 696675 > 842

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (10, 43, 219)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction