Information on Result #502885

There is no (16, 56, 389)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 383 634163 521339 978073 329879 036739 780678 194996 490504 > 856

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 57, 389)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction