Information on Result #503037

There is no (38, 64, 22602)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6278 640601 418759 667471 575694 412986 955952 986477 197808 671664 > 864

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (38, 65, 22602)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction