Information on Result #503047

There is no (21, 65, 589)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 50257 680009 901658 393588 690465 124186 149088 668006 209356 910608 > 865

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 66, 589)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction