Information on Result #503071

There is no (32, 66, 3278)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 402140 544275 826274 364618 759383 683844 579042 490865 480392 913444 > 866

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 67, 3278)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction