Information on Result #503411

There is no (26, 82, 695)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 113 329471 834481 169181 262763 683984 322809 952513 338744 690306 848299 652397 926812 > 882

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (26, 83, 695)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction