Information on Result #503597

There is no (51, 89, 19237)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 237 355872 472246 671922 780980 432997 418284 651831 623282 951340 435820 046659 382675 900232 > 889

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 90, 19237)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction