Information on Result #503631
There is no (15, 91, 289)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 15612 322234 848331 880601 230359 684924 233263 993047 381795 871050 142694 117687 977369 078400 > 891
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (15, 92, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (15, 93, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (15, 94, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (15, 95, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (15, 96, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (15, 97, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (15, 98, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (15, 99, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (15, 100, 289)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||