Information on Result #503741
There is no (21, 95, 414)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 66 766892 375673 232656 949196 750383 773271 998518 896048 499396 329451 555912 385788 858206 317820 > 895
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 96, 414)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |