Information on Result #503741

There is no (21, 95, 414)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 66 766892 375673 232656 949196 750383 773271 998518 896048 499396 329451 555912 385788 858206 317820 > 895

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 96, 414)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction