Information on Result #503747

There is no (33, 95, 1020)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 63 418806 217273 646925 709034 613689 231213 353668 085227 429959 186605 492085 213924 518862 913672 > 895

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 96, 1020)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction