Information on Result #503747
There is no (33, 95, 1020)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 63 418806 217273 646925 709034 613689 231213 353668 085227 429959 186605 492085 213924 518862 913672 > 895
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (33, 96, 1020)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |