Information on Result #503758

There is no (55, 95, 23103)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 62 208190 169741 767787 349683 983710 955734 816129 372142 710075 219023 754967 666361 879906 218121 > 895

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (55, 96, 23103)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction