Information on Result #503774

There is no (32, 96, 916)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 504 556355 659982 488140 979695 687864 057115 385766 501568 585274 114137 852895 106233 184431 901740 > 896

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 97, 916)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction