Information on Result #503846
There is no (64, 98, 164767)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 31831 669449 038937 104815 799176 783621 708373 449641 948942 925088 128249 183869 116242 045220 924910 > 898
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 99, 164767)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |