Information on Result #503862
There is no (39, 99, 1626)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 258250 332579 136683 565712 604128 109239 599119 318625 346673 035004 802973 519311 598794 749229 647264 > 899
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (39, 100, 1626)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |