Information on Result #503911
There is no (21, 101, 405)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 16 667361 326457 117116 313151 741808 133069 624011 711532 593564 988790 939942 544123 020619 174818 672360 > 8101
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 102, 405)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |