Information on Result #504079

There is no (62, 106, 29028)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 534386 650050 638712 761964 844111 025407 559008 432454 485390 250073 182272 671859 277973 944867 367971 107832 > 8106

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (62, 107, 29028)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction