Information on Result #504258

There is no (46, 112, 2164)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 140987 176981 713749 719342 758285 012962 074675 435886 892540 611893 953979 761721 286418 867916 245808 948310 697125 > 8112

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 113, 2164)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction