Information on Result #504895

There is no (86, 130, 280657)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2521 877848 129795 089904 461699 648230 407204 056113 348537 751679 967830 696113 331214 731312 205784 545203 852518 479679 640345 143712 > 8130

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 131, 280657)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction