Information on Result #504988

There is no (49, 133, 1682)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 302986 317698 342198 402509 762839 771964 883235 205851 598230 028340 371238 910866 840705 681575 322334 163965 428483 892536 498408 044192 > 8133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 134, 1682)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction