Information on Result #505014
There is no (26, 134, 489)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11 246162 378843 619849 430521 847034 316318 126423 216249 725414 882246 666640 170070 646760 605360 130325 792794 306366 657806 960967 547568 > 8134
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (26, 135, 489)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |