Information on Result #505054
There is no (29, 135, 555)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 86 377749 234622 999451 308275 256535 045643 367695 698845 016012 530408 367935 529696 460872 206718 419788 843447 015695 610244 009503 832192 > 8135
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (29, 136, 555)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |