Information on Result #505126

There is no (96, 136, 1641410)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 661 063338 795538 457204 169955 721305 261429 437783 958596 454952 194981 212743 550155 557986 899151 161467 904391 553517 543775 272752 616912 > 8136

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 137, 1641410)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction