Information on Result #505657
There is no (26, 150, 485)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2954 148216 718685 416735 644241 256412 783238 023580 258894 240012 823558 102570 212059 174048 081606 966219 721886 096105 577414 716791 575450 240152 993696 > 8150
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (26, 151, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (26, 152, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (26, 153, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (26, 154, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (26, 155, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (26, 156, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (26, 157, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (26, 158, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (26, 159, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (26, 160, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (26, 161, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (26, 162, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (26, 163, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (26, 164, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (26, 165, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (26, 166, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 17 | No (26, 167, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 18 | No (26, 168, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 19 | No (26, 169, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 20 | No (26, 170, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 21 | No (26, 171, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 22 | No (26, 172, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 23 | No (26, 173, 485)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||