Information on Result #505959
There is no (27, 157, 503)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6252 405981 624735 318231 904139 143556 913561 824651 858378 143178 859892 009294 431150 085144 868249 581870 432507 375686 473585 361068 102909 505869 323664 914818 > 8157
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (27, 158, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (27, 159, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (27, 160, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (27, 161, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (27, 162, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (27, 163, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (27, 164, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (27, 165, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (27, 166, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (27, 167, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (27, 168, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (27, 169, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (27, 170, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (27, 171, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (27, 172, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (27, 173, 503)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||