Information on Result #506120
There is no (82, 160, 11127)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 128384 697772 670853 031363 974327 331946 380963 481386 862237 093740 362853 459101 647896 046030 220373 737719 904206 476898 339244 954556 424238 266412 637662 234024 > 8160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (82, 161, 11127)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |