Information on Result #506122
There is no (86, 160, 16807)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 127996 749658 385906 443850 331704 072017 025480 685789 677074 107926 340790 549580 906840 857777 209263 638207 184029 993154 120518 265334 164145 973533 776387 113962 > 8160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (86, 161, 16807)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |