Information on Result #506122

There is no (86, 160, 16807)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 127996 749658 385906 443850 331704 072017 025480 685789 677074 107926 340790 549580 906840 857777 209263 638207 184029 993154 120518 265334 164145 973533 776387 113962 > 8160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 161, 16807)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction