Information on Result #506124
There is no (90, 160, 26683)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 125618 555070 807982 922992 867621 737721 299410 803202 641093 474027 890182 631200 303033 390333 917777 952206 557488 675812 560652 389736 259916 375979 794094 283952 > 8160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (90, 161, 26683)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |