Information on Result #506127
There is no (96, 160, 59854)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 123247 276474 615450 644176 939549 951930 917458 165692 802466 950852 537920 064400 876812 668719 960287 893142 804212 419492 817006 805341 585260 561035 874500 598626 > 8160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (96, 161, 59854)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |