Information on Result #506130
There is no (102, 160, 160155)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 121803 117574 871872 923666 082044 816000 212146 848399 951989 134068 118078 521162 610306 595254 183538 069922 465500 996004 001838 279741 040975 951756 620604 791360 > 8160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (102, 161, 160155)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |