Information on Result #506140

There is no (33, 161, 620)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26 893647 878505 162674 114919 990060 610962 707987 234571 396939 333483 506632 800768 811040 526549 311385 143566 991825 842124 133191 557421 044243 984373 287817 487327 > 8161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 162, 620)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction